Amana AMC4322GS vs Whirlpool WMCS7024RB
The Whirlpool adds sensor cooking that the Amana lacks.
Bottom line
Choose the Amana if you prioritise a smaller footprint; go with the Whirlpool if sensor cooking matters more to you.
Spec Comparison
| Spec | Amana AMC4322GS | Whirlpool WMCS7024RB |
|---|---|---|
| Wattage Higher wattage cooks faster and more evenly. | 1200W | 1200W |
| Capacity Larger capacity fits bigger dishes. | 2.20 cu ft | 2.20 cu ft |
| Width Narrower fits tighter counter spaces. | 24 1/8" ✓ | 24 3/4" |
| Height Shorter clears low cabinet clearances. | 13 5/8" ✓ | 14 3/16" |
| Depth Shallower fits narrow shelves and counters. | 20 5/16" | 19 1/4" ✓ |
| Turntable Larger turntable fits bigger plates. | 16" ✓ | 14" |
| Sensor Cooking Auto-adjusts time based on steam — no guessing. | No | Yes ✓ |
| Inverter True variable power for better defrost and reheating. | No | No |
| Convection | No | No |
| Air Fry | No | No |
| WiFi / Smart | No | No |
| Amperage Lower draw works on shared circuits. | — | 15A |
✓ indicates the better value for that spec. Ties not marked.
Amana AMC4322GS
Sponsored Whirlpool WMCS7024RB
Sponsored Alternate Microwaves
Similar models in this size and power range
Related Comparisons
See the full spec sheet for each model: